The latest issue of our monthly PDF magazine can be paged through here, or you may download the PDF file by clicking on the icon below. Please enjoy our magazine, and if you do, share it widely!

  Click the icon to download The Saxon Messenger, and share it with everyone you can!

by William Finck

While visiting with Clifton Emahiser earlier this month, I had the good pleasure of meeting some old and dear friends of his, a long-time Christian Israel family. Barely out of the van we were greeted by several children who had been playing on the lawn. One of them was ten-year old Rebecca, bright and smiling, “Hello William”, she beamed. Rebecca, to my surprise, already knew me through the many Christogenea recordings she had listened to with her uncles, and she had been anticipating my visit. The inquisitive young lady had lots of things to tell me, and she also had lots questions. Oh, did she have questions! Having once been a father of six, I know what a treasure such an inquisitive child can be, so I was more than happy to entertain her.

“William, are you a racist?” I realized that she must have already known the answer, and that perhaps she only wanted to hear it first-hand. I also forgave the Marxist terminology, which is difficult to avoid since it has saturated the entire society by way of both the media and the educational system, where alternatives are never offered. “Yes, Rebecca, I am a racist”. With smiling approbation she announced “Well, I'm a racist too.” Oh Rebecca, that is wonderful, since God created race and people who are racists love and seek to preserve God's creation! That is the first commandment in Genesis, repeated so many times, everything after its kind. Rebecca's proud proclamation must have been formulated through her having heard such things as I have repeated in many of my programs, which shows just how impressionable such young childrfen are.

This important article, pertinent to this month's upcoming Saxon Messenger editorial, was found nowhere online, so we take the liberty to reproduce it here.

ISSUE 4 - 2011 - UK COLUMN – Page 24

Suicides In The Welsh Valleys: A Cry For Help From Our Young People Or Something Dark At Work In Our Society? Understanding Is The First Step To A Solution.

by Brian Gerrish

Some two years ago national media and press reports high­ lighted a spate of suicides in South Wales, mostly in the area of Bridgend and Rhondda. Principally teenagers and young people in their twenties, a few victims were in their mid forties and early fifties. The deaths came in clusters, sometimes amongst young people closely related or connected with each other, and at times amongst individuals in the same area.

A telling sign that something unusual is at work, is the fact that the majority of victims hanged themselves. This is generally at odds with national statistics where hanging is the preferred method of men and boys, and women and girls choose an overdose or other method.

Starting in early 2007, the numbers soon passed double figures, and the suicides rapidly raised media attention. with reports generating much speculation on the causes. This in turn caused some anger at the press - a few parents accused the media of "glamorising ways of taking one's life to young people", whilst the MP for the Bridgend area said that the media were "now part of the problem." Apparently as a result of such criticism the media and press were encouraged to scale back reports so as to calm emotions and to help stop 'copycat' suicides.

Somalier protesterar mot svenska välfärden

As reported by the Jewish news outlet Ynetnews, the Lithuanian government has recently entered into an extortion agreement with European Jewry, according to Reuters. The article states that “Lithuania's government on Wednesday approved a foundation to allocate 128 million litas ($49.45 million) in compensation for Jewish communal property appropriated during Nazi and Soviet times. The step follows last year's decision by the parliament to pass a special law after years of negotiations and calls from Lithuania's Western allies, including the United States, to reach the settlement.”

It is Lithuania which should be collecting from the Jews, and not the Jews from Lithuania. The tiny Baltic state was first attacked by the Bolsheviks attempting to keep it from independence at the end of 1918. The Bolsheviks only failed because of the help of the German Freikorps. Over the immediately subsequent years Lithuania was forced to fight wars against the Bermontians (a mix of German and Russian anti-Bolshevik military forces who sought to maintain power in the region in the aftermath of the First World War), the Poles and the Latvians, where Lithuania was never the aggressor. Before 1919, Lithuania did not even have an army of its own.

Lithuania fought hard, and against all odds, to maintain its independence during the inter-war period of the 1920's and 1930's. During this period, the Jews in Lithuania were unmolested, and and they evidently thrived. The government of Lithuania, due to territorial and other disputes, opposed National Socialist Germany at an early time, and Germany even imposed an embargo against Lithuania. As Europe once again neared war, Lithuania was only a pawn on the map between Germany and the Soviets, until the Soviets annexed the Baltic states in 1940. In 1941 Germany invaded and occupied Lithuania. Many Lithuanians cheered Germany as a deliverer from the Soviet oppression. Many Lithuanians were compelled to assist the war effort by Germany. But on the other hand, many Lithuanians resisted the German occupation, and some even formed a pro-Soviet armed resistance, in league with minority Russians and Jews. The Lithuanian people as a whole, therefore, who were always imposed upon by the much larger powers, can by no means be seen as aggressors or as being responsible for anything which happened to non-Lithuanians during the war. After the war, Lithuania was returned to Soviet rule until 1988. The Lithuanian people were every bit as much victims of circumstances as the Jews claim to be, and even to a greater extent, for they were victims of the Jews: it is common knowledge that Bolshevism itself was Jewish, the Bolshevik leaders were nearly all Jewish, and Bolshevism was the primary cause of the Second World War in the east in the first place.

The Ynetnews article also cites the chairman of the Lithuanian Jewish Community as saying that there are “about 4,000 Jews left in Lithuania”. According to a Wikipedia article on Lithuania, only about 2,000–3,000 Lithuanian Jews were liberated from German camps. How many of the 4,000 Jews in Lithuania today could actually have been survivors of any supposed “Holocaust” which allegedly took place there 70 years ago? The article goes on to say that “The payments are to be spread over a ten-year period. The first payment of $1.15 million will be used to assist the needy Lithuanian Holocaust survivors.” Needy Holocaust survivors? All none of them? Judaism itself is an organized extortion racket, and the world's longest-running crime ring.

William Finck

Christogenea.org

The Irish people are waking up to the realization that all of the high taxes imposed by Western governments are only to cover the bad investments of the bankers.

There is a wealth of articles trumpeting the inauguration of the new European Jewish Parliament in news sources which are produced for Jews, such as the European Jewish Press, Arutz Sheva, Europe-Israel.org, Chabad, the European Jewish Union website, and many other outlets, however little is known of this new parliament outside of Jewish circles. While it has been planned for quite some time, and the Jewish outlet Ynetnews reported on its formation as early as August of 2011, there is nothing about it in any major media produced for the general European public. Of course, it is already vaunted on the pages of the world's largest pro-Jewish propaganda outlet, Wikipedia, but only on a page concerning the European Jewish Union (EJU). The article states that “The EJU hopes to establish a European Jewish Parliament, comprising 120 members modeled on the Israeli Knesset This group would then represent the concerns of the Jewish community to the European Union.” Of course, there has been a European Jewish Congress for several decades, which has long been careful to downplay itself as a civic association while at the same time exerting an influence over European governments which far exceeds the proportions of the Jewish population. However this new Jewish Parliament is no civic association. Its meeting place is the very same as that of the regular European Union Parliament in Brussels, and its members are calling themselves “MEJPs”, or Members of the European Jewish Parliament. This is not merely a civic association.

From now until May 13th there is a 25% off sale on print copies of The Saxon Messenger at HP MagCloud. This is on HP, so take advantage!

Last July we wrote in Philthadelphia about the corrupted revising of American history in order to wrongly give credit for the making of this society to those groups who have as of late come to dominate the city, especially Negros and Jews. We said that “Today it is their monuments which are quickly coming to dominate Philadelphia, and they are rewriting our history in order for them to make it even easier to corrupt and destroy our nation.” A display of this same phenomenon was made in our February Saxon Messenger editorial, Worshipping the Beast, where it was explained that at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, American History up to the Civil War is portrayed as little more than a debate over the issue of slavery and the plight of Negros, when in fact that debate was only an incidental part of both the history of that era and the causes of the war itself. We also attempted to illustrate how other facets of American history, such as the nature of the American air forces in World War Two Europe, were being distorted by those same groups for that very same purpose.

On another recent trip to the Philadelphia area, we now notice that the same people are up to the same shenanigans, and that they are forging history at Valley Forge. Amidst the monuments commemorating those White men who left the comfort of their homes and farms and kin in order to fight for a cause they believed in, there is now at least one large monument - relatively new compared to the others, and also quite different from all of the others - which clearly has no part with the others. While most of the roadside monuments encircling the Valley Forge grounds have the names of real men, mostly of the rankof Colonel, who had been among the officers of the regiments which camped through that historic winter during the Revolution, this one large granite monument has emblazoned in bronze on its front “Patriots of African Descent”, below a large relief of a male Negro in the regular military dress of the period. Actually, his uniform looks fairly rich compared to the accounts of the tattered condition of the troops who actually lived through that winter encampment.

On the back side of the monument it has engraved “In honor of patriots of African descent who served suffered and sacrificed during the Valley Forge encampment”. This assertion is then propped up by the claims of a modern Negro and supposed historian named Charles L. Blockson, who is quoted as saying that “Throughout these historic and hallowed campsites were courageous black patriots who participated in our nation's bitter fight for independence”. The monument then has a notice, that it was dedicated by the Valley Forge chapter of some sorority, and there is a bronze placard on its back presumably containing the names of all of the Negresses and others involved in getting the monument erected. Of course, there is very little real history of any Negroes who fought in combat for the cause, or who were encamped at Valley Forge along with those non-imaginary White men who actually did participate in the struggle.

By William Finck

This month in The Saxon Messenger we are reprinting Chaucer's The Prioress' Tale, which is a story about young Hugh of Lincoln, who lived and died in the 13th century. Nowadays, when The Canterbury Tales are reprinted, the story is often omitted from publication. It is about a young boy killed by the Jews in what is commonly called a Jewish ritual murder. Similar circumstances surrounded the deaths of many other young boys and girls of medieval and modern Europe. It should be no wonder, with the prevalence of Jews in society now, that many children each year are still disappearing.

It is not recorded, that any Jews lived in England after the Saxon conquest, up to the time of the Norman invasion. However Jews came to England with the Normans, and in the 12th century they were able to create settlements in many large English towns, under the license and protection of the kings. In these places, they soon became quite unpopular for their pandering and their usury – things which Christians were barred from and which only Jews could practise. This alone made them despised by the people, however the kings found them to be a useful and convenient source of tax revenue. The Jew would feed on the weak, and the king could tax the Jew heavily. The Jew still managed to amass wealth at a far faster rate than if he had actually engaged in labor, and was able to acquire or establish many other businesses through his profits from usury and other seedy endeavors, making him despised all the more.

Once the Jews became established as a special and protected class in the towns of old England, Christian children began disappearing. Some of the bodies were found, and we shall never know how many were not found because - so far as we can tell - such records were never kept. One of the better summaries of the known history of Jewish ritual murder of Christian children in England, which also mentions cases from elsewhere in Europe, is My Irrelevant Defence being Meditations Inside Gaol and Out on Jewish Ritual Murder by Arnold S. Leese in 1938. In it, Leese describes the recorded circumstances surrounding the deaths of William of Norwich, Simon of Trent, and several other famous and lesser- known cases, and Jews were believed to be the culpable perpetrators in all of them. Many of the bodies of the victims were clearly crucified or sacrificed, and severe repercussions against Jews often followed such discoveries. Leese shows that, following a long history of such cases, one month after “a Jew, Isaac de Pulet, [was] detained for the murder of a Christian boy at Oxford ... King Edward I issued his decree expelling the Jews from the Kingdom. There is, then, every reason to believe that it was the Oxford murder which proved the last straw in toleration.” Of course the Jews had other problems, associated with a general Christian backlash against the evils of usury, and therefore they were not so useful for revenue purposes as they had been. However that alone would not have caused their expulsion, if they had been otherwise peaceable residents. Leese also shows, from documented historical sources, that Jewish ritual murder of Christian children was “one of the chief factors” in the decision of Ferdinand and Isabella to expel the Jews from Spain in 1492.

In 1944, Dr. Hellmut Schramm wrote a book, Der jüdische Ritualmord Eine historische Untersuchung, which has been translated into English by one R. Belser as Ritual Murder in Kiev. This book details the events surrounding the death of the young Andrei Yustschinsky in 1911, and also summarizes the known history of Jewish ritual murder of non-Jewish – and mostly Christian – children in Europe and elsewhere, including many of the cases which Leese also discussed. The book, full of historical references and citations, also tells how the Jews were often successful at covering up their crimes with bribes, extortion, and other more barbaric methods, things which the Leese book also relates in certain instances.

Is this the Scotland of Robert Burns and William Wallace? We had a piece on this story ijn the February Saxon Messenger. The synopsis of the Robert Green case below is courtesy of Mr. Mike Green, to whom we are appreciative.

You may recall that some time ago I alerted you to the case of Hollie  Greig. Hollie is a Downs Syndrome girl from Scotland who suffered abuse by a paedophile ring over a period of 14 years. When Hollie eventually told her mum Anne about what was going on, and Anne reported Hollie's abuse to Scottish police, the Scottish authorities went into overdrive to cover up the case. When Anne attempted to have the case investigated she was assaulted, drugged, placed in a mental hospital and told she was mentally ill. No proper investigation was ever carried out. The Scottish courts also blocked a BBC documentary that was being made about the case, and even issued an injunction preventing the BBC from reporting on ANY paedophilia taking place in Scotland. This is because those who Hollie named as being involved in her abuse included a judge, a senior police officer and members of social services among others. Hollie and Anne have had to flee Scotland and have since been subjected to abuse and intimidation by English police and social services. Despite the failure of the authorities to investigate this case, Hollie was awarded criminal injury compensation. This demonstrates that the authorities have accepted that Hollie was abused, but are simply not willing to expose the perpetrators.

Last week Mr Robert Green, a concerned citizen and friend of Hollie and Anne who has been trying to draw attention to this case, was imprisoned for one year by the Scottish courts. His terrible crime was that he was on his way to Aberdeen city centre to distribute leaflets relating to his intention to stand as a member of parliament on the issue of the failure of the Scottish authorities to investigate Hollie Greig's abuse. Robert's trial followed close on the heels of the trial of an "oil boss" who had some 50,000 images of child pornography on his computer. How many years imprisonment did this "oil boss" get? None, he was sentenced to community service. So in the UK we now have a situation where those involved in the abuse of children don't go to prison, while those who try to expose child abuse get locked away. Police have been coming forward in ever increasing numbers to report that investigations into paedophile gangs across the UK are being shut down when it becomes apparent that some of the paedophiles are "very important people", some of whom are members of the British parliament. Indeed police have stated that if we want to get to grips with the paedophilia situation in the UK, which is currently out of control, we need to begin in the heart of Westminster.

The radio programme linked below will provide you with much invaluable information about what is going on in this country regarding our children and the corrupt police and judicial system. This is serious folks, ignore it at your peril, otherwise it might be your children and grandchildren next.

The Lou Collins Radio Show : February 20th 2012. This week on The Lou Collins Radio Show, Lou speaks with Brian Gerrish from UK Column in regards to the recent arrest of Robert Green for the vicious crime of attempting to hand out leaflets.

Lou and Brian also speak with Ian Puddick about his continued fight against corruption and abuse of police resources.

The Lou Collins Radio Show airs each Monday at 11am GMT on Soundart Radio, 102.5FM Totnes and Online at http://www.soundartradio.org.uk/

For more of his work, see Mr. Lee's website at rebwest.com

Mike Delaney of Prothink.org addresses some of the misleading tactics that the judaized liberals disseminate throughout White society daily.