Profound Revolution Chapter 6 - Financing World Empire

The industrial build-up of Africa is incredible,—it is absolutely fantastic.  It is all under the control of the United Nations. The United Nations is quietly and most efficiently go­ing about the work for which it was created. There are many UN agencies engaged in this global project and other organizations from Member Nations render valu­able assistance. The principal governmental organiza­tion involved is the U S Agency for International De­velopment. Of the more than TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND "intellectuals" scouring the earth to find places to spend our money, seventy-five thousand of them are on the payroll of the Agency for International Develop­ment, commonly called AID.

Shortly after the United Nations came into being, another Charter, that of the International Bank of Reconstruction and Development, the World Bank, was ratified by the Treaty as a treaty. The UN had come equipped with its own Supreme Court,—the Internation­al Court of Justice, whose Charter had been adopted by the Senate at the same time as that of the United Na­tions. Now it had its own World Bank. They were losing no time in equipping themselves with the trap­pings of empire. Perhaps some notes on the subject of the World Bank will indicate what the UN had in mind. And it was not, by any stretch of the imagina­tion, "international peace and security."

The International Bank for Reconstruction and De­velopment was just one of four World banks incor­porated into the UN system in its early days. The IBRD was the largest of these and was forced to "provide and facilitate international investment in projects intended to increase production, raise living standards, and help bring about a better balance in world trade."

This bank began with a capitalization of TEN BIT­LTON dollars. After a few years the capitalization was raised to TWENTY-ONE BILLION dollars. Most of the money came, in one way or another, from the producers of the United States who have been forced into unpay­able debt to finance the numerous world building pro­jects of the United Nations. The 1963-64 report of the World Bank states: "The Bank began its operations in 1946. Since then it has made 349 loans amounting to more than $7,­000,000,000 in 64 Member countries and overseas ter­ritories." The report continues to relate that the largest categories for bank lending are for the develop­ment of electric power ($2,235,000,000) and for trans­portation ($2,260,000,000). How, if ever, these "loans" are to be re-paid is not stated.

A map shown on the UN publication "Helping Eco­nomic Development in Asia and the Far East" might help the reader get a preview of what is to come if UN plans go not awry. After describing the terrain of the Continent of Asia as mountainous and rocky, rendering road construction very expensive,—the article goes on to state that in the interest of international trade among the nations of Asia the UN is planning (in 1963) a net­work of roads in Asia which will provide 34,000 miles of hard top transportation. In case you have missed the implication of these figures it might be pointed out that this is the equivalent of TEN roads from New York to California. And this is just one of THOUSANDS of world building projects in operation or on the drawing boards of the UN and its agencies.

This sort of thing cannot be paid for in cash. There isn't that much money in the world. The wealth of the American people is being pledged for the bulk of the spending while the UN is taking the credit for it. What the UN finances, the UN controls. Page 44 of the Bank report relates:

"Agreement has been reached on the roads to be included in the network, on priorities for construction and on minimum construction standards. A code has been drawn up to govern traffic on the Asian highway.”

The code contains provisions for international driving permits, a uniform system of road signs and sig­nals, pavement markings and road work signs. I quote from the "United Nations Development Decade," page 69:

“The plans for a Pan-American Highway (already in an advanced stage of completion) and an Asian highway show the kind of project now being under­taken. These projects will probably be consider­ably expanded under international auspices. Similar programs will be undertaken elsewhere, es­pecially in Africa. Networks of the transcontin­ental highways will have to be planned in advance and coordinated with the general economic devel­opment plans of the countries concerned. The in­vestment required for such large modern highways will have to be encouraged and offered adequate protection."

Page 44 of the Bank Report relates:

"In the field of railways one of ECAFE's prin­cipal achievements has been the establishment in Lahore, Pakistan, of a United Nations training cen­ter for Railway Operating and Signaling Officials . . . Studies and recommendations made by ECAFE concerning railroads have included improved meth­ods of track construction and maintenance; speedier turn-around of rolling stock; augmented capacity of single track lines; railway track sleepers and problems of attaining higher train speeds in rela­tion to track maintenance, and better design for rolling stock."

In addition to the foreign aid investments of the American taxpayer, many other nations, all of whom have been, or still are, on our gift list, have been con­tributing to the empire building. A study of the moun­tain of U. N. documents on the subject gives evidence that even the fabulous sums of foreign aid and other contributions filched from our taxpayers will not pay for the grandiose plans of the more than TWO HUND­RED THOUSAND planners and spenders working on the U. N. projects.

The following might shed some light on the REAL reason the American forces are in Viet Nam:

"One of the most ambitious projects instigated and promoted by ECAFE (Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East —ed.) is the development of the lower Mekong River Basin, which is shared by Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Viet Nam. . . the Mekong project is a unique effort in the history of international cooperation. . . The first five year programs of INVESTIGATIONS has been virtually completed. . . and a second five year INVESTIGA­TION programme expected to cost about 21 million dollars has been drawn up."

Practical men might regard this as expensive in­vestigation—more than forty million dollars worth of it—for ONE PROJECT in a two-year period. This re­port was made in 1962. If we can just keep in mind, if we can grasp the fact at all, the International Devel­opment in UNese means development of the whole world —putting the whole world into production-then it will be seen that the term "Empire-Building" is not a cliche, but a solid fact.

In early 1961, the President declared a Develop­ment Decade from 1960 to 1970. At the end of that Decade the U. N. expected to have Africa, Asia and South America in an advanced state of industrialization. At the end of the first half of the decade they had made great progress and have every reason to better this showing in the last half as they collect more and more of the money saved by disarmament. In the meantime, the planners and other "experts," unable to produce anything but plans and programs, go merrily along, dreaming and committing the dreams to paper while they await the time when the plans will be put into ef­fect by PRODUCERS.

These self-styled "intellectuals" are putting in time as they await the day when the established fact of World Empire can be revealed and the whole global pro­ject set in motion. On that great day, these will become the herd masters on the International Animal Farm. They do not ask or expect command positions. They know who will be in charge. It is enough for them that they supervise the great new world of their creation and retain a place at the second table.

Nothing could better illustrate the enormity of the Empire-building project than some of the U. N. reports on the PLANNING STAGES:

"RESEARCH AND STATISTICS: No statistics are necessary to prove that the people of Asia and the Far East have relativel^y low standards of living, or that with a few exceptions, their agriculture is back­ward and their industries under-developed. But to tackle these problems exact information is neces­sary. Here we come up against a difficulty which ECAFE has faced from the beginning and has not yet overcome: the inadequacy of accurate economic data for the many countries of the region.

"Clearly the statistical basis must be improved if the questions concerning ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT are to be tackled satisfactorily. (Since its start in 1947 —ed.) ECAFE has collected and assessed statistics from the various countries of the region and has cooperated in improving methods through regional conferences of statisticians. This work gained im­petus after the Conference of Asian statisticians was established as a permanent body in 1957.

"The main purpose of the Conference is to further sound statistical development within each coun­try, and to do this expert groups meet frequently to discuss statistical problems of common interest in their countries. . . Beginning in 1957 the official publication has, in addition to a review of the cur­rent economic situation in Asia. taken up each year the study of one major economic problem, for ex­ample, types of the ECONOMY prevailing in the ECAFE region . . . post-war INDUSTRIALIZATION; post-war trade; post-war finance; economic growth; Asia's trade with Western Europe. .. import sub­stitution and export diversification."

These multi-billion dollar "think" projects have not succeeded in getting the industrialization effort off the around. Hence the announcement by the President of the creation of the "Asian Executive Service Corps" headed by Mr. Eugene Black, former head of the World Bank, Vice-president of the Chase Manhattan Bank and Member of the Council on Foreign Relations. It may safely be assumed that Mr. Black and his associates will get things moving and that the PROFIT MOTIVE will not be overlooked in the process.

On Page 55 of The U. N. Development Decade, we find:

"The General Assembly has expressed concern over the inadequacy of what is being done to help indus­trial development. . . and the Economic and Social Council has stated that more technical assistance and pre-investment expenditure must be devoted to industrial development. .. The program of action proposed. . . includes research and operational ac­tivities which are complimentary and mutuall^y sup­porting. They are as follows:

"Support of industrial planning and project plan­ning. Extension of industries advisory services. Promotion of small industries, with special emphas­is on industrial estates.

"Particular attention will be given to drawing up priorities for industries and making forecasts of the demand for industrial products (page 56) . . .It is proposed to assemble a group of experts with supporting staff. Each expert will be familiar with industrial planning and programming in general and with particular sectors of industry, but specialized consultants (experienced men?—ed.) will also be needed in certain cases. Close cooperation between the economic and technical experts should ensure greater coordination of, the economic and engineer­ing aspects of industrial planning."

Time and space do not permit further discussion of the World Industrial Development Program. There is literally hundreds of TONS of official U. N. information on the subject.

The point to be made is simply that the United Nations IS engaged in World Empire building in Africa and in Asia and the work is far advanced. It might be well to point out also that, should this vast area be put into industrial production, it will require many MIL­LIONS of SKILLED industrial workers and considerable skilled management. This labor and management are to be found only in highly industrialized nations, prin­cipally in the United States.

It might be suggested also, that the existing mone­tary systems of the civilized world will not begin to sup­port the world-wide programs of the United Nations and that this is the real reason the International Currency is being prepared for launching. The World Govern­ment, which is the U. N., proposes to issue a WORLD CURRENCY and issue all currency through the World Bank which is a U. N. institution. Still the American people refuse to believe that the United Nations IS A WORLD GOVERNMENT.