Profound Revolution Chapter 9 - American Labor UN-ternationalized

Representing, as they do, the U. N. ONLY, the del­egates to the various U. N. agencies voted to appropriate the property and earning of their native countries to serve U. N. interests alone. A proper majority is two-thirds of the General Assembly and this proper majori­ty now rests with the African and Asian block. THEY CAN MUSTER A ²/3 VOTE ON ANYTHING NOW; THEY can compel any Member State of the U. N. to "accept and carry out" anything they decree, no matter what it is.

The intentions of the delegates in exercising the UNLIMITED POWER, now in their hands, became very clear and very terrifying to men of discernment, when UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) met in Geneva in 1964 to assert the RIGHTS proclaimed for them by numerous General As­sembly and UNESCO resolutions. These resolutions guaranteed that when the tribal nations had been put into industrial production, the Western industrialized nations would be forced to step aside and permit the production of these formerly "under-developed" nations to attain preference in the world markets.

This, too, was to be accomplished "notwithstanding the provisions of any other law" in any state or nation on earth. It was to be accomplished by TAXING the Western nations to SUBSIDIZE THEIR COMPETITION, by limiting or prohibiting the import of products from any but the "newly emerging nations" and in any other way the same purpose can be accomplished. By U. N. standards, the END ALWAYS JUSTIFIES THE MEANS.

The UNCTAD Conference was attended by delega­tions from seventy-seven new, emerging or under-level oped nations and thirty-five industrial nations. This conference was called as soon as the "emerging na­tions" had the necessary two-thirds vote the seventy seven voted right down the line for the same proposals. The report of the conference filled two hundred pages. The proposals to be voted on by the General Assembly, when the time is propitious, consist of such items as:

"Industrial countries to surrender control of ex­isting trade and^. industry to the under-developed nations; advanced countries release patents and in­ventions and stop technical developments that would improve their own industrial progress; indus­trial nations shall guarantee to buy products from under-developed nations at good prices so the poor­er nations would not have to meet competition, and the industrial nations should provide the money for under-developed nations to build the plants which would make the products whose markets would be guaranteed."

There is NOTHING NEW about all this. Literally tons of United Nations publications have proclaimed these goals repeatedly in the past ten years. The press did not report it. The Government, always deaf, dumb and blind where United Nations ambitions are at stake, failed and refused to tell the People anything about it. The reason is evident—they are not out to foment COUNTER-REVOLUTION. The Houses of Congress, presumably informed of the destructive aims and pur­poses of the United Nations, obediently hand out thous­ands of millions of tax dollars to accomplish the very purposes set forth here. Congress accepts U. N. DIS­CIPLINE in our names and slavishly carries out the de­crees of this outlaw organization.

The President is charged with seeing that these de­crees are carried out without question or equivocation. This he has attempted to do, in the matter of accepting the dictates of UNCTAD, which may already have been adopted by the General Assembly and handed down to him by RESOLUTION. The Poverty Program is a step in the right direction; the Great Society is another. Both programs proclaim great benefits, not for the American People, but for the WHOLE WORLD. This is the reason Mr. Shriver heads both the Youth Corps and the Pover­ty Program. They are one and the same U. N. project. There can be no benefit to the American producer, labor and management alike, in the new move to RE­DISTRIBUTE THE WEALTH world-wide. This inten­tion—to re-distribute the wealth of the world among all the people in the world^—as long as it lasts, which will not be long—is firmly imbedded in the U. N. Char­ter in the oft-repeated phrase, ECONOMIC EQUALITY.

Just as "racial equality" has been interpreted to mean "one man, one vote" so "economic equality" means one man, one dollar, ruble, peso or unit of INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY. All U. N. agencies are welded together in a perfectly organized and illimitable financed move toward that goal. This is stated in their own publications a thousand times over. These pub­lications have limited circulation. The few who do read them either favor the drive for World Empire or fail to realize the import of the very cautious and evasive lang­uage through which the UN-ers express their intentions, their "principles and purposes."

The CHIEF of the U. N. agencies is the Interna­tional Labour Organization. For many years, the American delegates have been Jay Lovestone and Irving Brown, both long-recognized as "communists," both having found it advisable to move to another land. Lovestone was a charter member of the Communist Party, U. S. A. Both feel quite at home in their present surroundings. Both are C. F. R. member agents.

The International Labour Organization proposes to control Labour world-wide. It has numerous charters, some of which have been adopted by the United States Senate as Treaties. We have accepted the provisions of this organization's charters as LAW of the land and have agreed to conform to them "notwithstanding the provisions of any other law.”

The U. N. empires in Asia and Africa will require millions of skilled industrial laborers and an immense segment of industrial management. They will not be hiring the top executives. These have already been called into service. About two years ago Mr. Jacob Javits, U. S. Senator from NewYork, who appears to be the official spokesman for the Council on Foreign Relations in the Senate, told the Senate that he and David Rockefeller had been discussing matters and had come to the conclusion that the business situation in Africa would be helped immensely if there could be appointed an "Executive Service Corps"—a group, or committee of "distinguished" businessmen who would lead the indust­rial progress of Africa and, in time, of other "developing areas."

Sure enough, within a few months the President did appoint an Executive Service Corps, the Chairman—SURPRISE?— Mr. David Rockefeller. The Committee is, almost exclusively, a Council on Foreign Relations outfit. They will not necessarily go to Africa to handle things and get our tax money out of the "pipeline," but they will undertake the job of getting the whole indust­rial empire project moving.

Paul Hoffman and his wife, the former Anna Rosen­berg. have been running the show and Pail opines that he will need 250,000 EXECUTIVES to handle the job. A brochure of the Agency for International Develop­ment (AID) has come to the desk of the writer, each page marked top and bottom, in large black print: LIMITED OFFICIAL USE. This tells of the enormous needs in man-power and materials to get the industrialization of Africa moving toward its goal. The publication as­serts that the labor and industrial management needed to meet their requirements, must come from "over­seas" and they hint that they do not anticipate difficul­ty in getting this labor and management because the United Nations has ways and means to get things done. A brief sketch of the policies of the International Lab­our Organization might suggest several methods.

The I. L. O., which was organized during the term of the League of Nations, was adopted into the United Nations with TREATY STATUS and so recognized by the United States Senate, has used its enormous work force to collect labor statistics world-wide. They have an enormous collection and they do not collect them as a hobby. The I. L. 0. has published a little booklet, "Lasting Peace the I. L. 0. Way." This little gem starts right off by informing its readers that its existence pre­dated the information of the U. N. by many years. It then goes on to say:

"Most simply,—the I. L. 0. is an ASSOCIATION OF NATIONS—an association created to do a specific job. This job is to improve working and living conditions all over the world. .. Beyond this im­mediate purpose is the longer range objective of helping to ESTABLISH AN INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY OF NATIONS in which all peoples may live at peace and amid steadily increasing pros­perity."

The I. L. 0. has always been long on proclamation but, unfortunately, their proclamations have a weird way of becoming LAW in the United States. The little publication under discussion shows that practically ALL United States Labor Laws and many of the outlandish Agricultural Laws and directives also come from the International Labour Organization. We find that the I. L. 0., at least, recognized that the SOLE purpose of the U. N. was not in maintaining "international peace and security." On Page 7, they state the whole propo­sition:

"Today the I. L. 0. is associated with the United Nations in the great new effort to maintain peace and to FURTHER HUMAN PROGRESS that was launched with the signing of the United Nations Charter. . . The relationship is governed by an AGREEMENT in which the United Nations recognizes the I. L. 0. as a Specialized Agency RESPONSIBLE FOR ACTION TO ACCOMPLISH the aims set forth in its Constitution."

The I. L. 0. promptly got into the law-making busi­ness and laid the groundwork for the TREATY RACKET which was to follow in the United Nations twenty-five years later. On page 17, we find:

"The suggestion that the I. L. 0. should be an actual legislative body was rejected. Most governments (in 1919—ed.) found it impossible to accept a plan which would give to an international agency the power to legislate for them. . .

"The Commission finally hit upon a compromise. The solution it found is one of the features that makes the I. L. 0. unique among the international agencies today.

"Under this scheme, the Organization would draw up draft conventions similar to treaties. These would not automatically become binding upon the Member Countries but the members would be required to consider accepting or ratifying them. And once a country has ratified a Convention it would be required to give effect to it, and to submit reports on the way it was being done."

So we find that away back in 1919, the I. L. O. had hit upon a "scheme" making it COMPULSORY for any nation ratifying a Convention—as the United States ratified^, the U. N. Convention (Charter), TO GIVE EF­FECT TO IT." Just so, the United States Government is REQUIRED to give effect (accept and carry out) the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.

In the Spring of 1944, reports the booklet, the Gen­eral Conference of the I. L. 0. met in Philadelphia and drew up a declaration which the then President Roose­velt said summed up the "aspirations of an epoch which well has known two world wars and may well acquire a his­torical significance similar to that of the Declaration of Independence."

One of the proclamations of the I. L. 0. declaration was:

"Poverty anywhere constitutes a danger to prosper­ity everywhere. That the war against want requires to be carried on with unrelenting vigour within each nation and by continuous and concert­ed international effort. . . with a view of promotion of the common welfare." (of the world—ed.)

Here we find the REAL SOURCE of the War on Poverty. It was incorporated into the Charter of one of the I. L. O. bodies which, when adopted by the U. S. Senate as a treaty, became law of the land. Treaty Law, as had been stated, was succeeded by Resolution Law when President Eisenhower agreed, in order to kill off the Bricker Amendment, that Treaty Law would be suspended. President Johnson proclaimed War Against Poverty all Over the World AT THE EXPENSE OF THE UNITED STATES. In this, he is simply imple­menting the Treaty Law of the I. L. 0. and the Resolu­tion Law of the United Nations itself.

The booklet then continues:

"The central aim for national and international poli­cy, the Declaration asserts, must be the ATTAIN­MENT OF CONDITIONS in which all human beings have the right to pursue their material well-being and their spiritual development in conditions of freedom and dignity, of ECONOMIC SECURITY and EQUAL OPPORTUNITY."

American producers and taxpayers would do well to ponder the implications of this high-sounding rhetor­ic. In this country we are just beginning to experience the impact of the EQUAL OPPORTUNITY proclama­tions of the United Nations as IMPLEMENTED by Pres­idential decree, Court decision and Congressional action­ Equal opportunity—WORLD-WIDE—c a n be accom­plished only through COMPULSION, compulsion which will deprive the American producer of the fruits of his production and make of him an economic slave to the lazy, the incompetent and the shiftless of the world. The declaration ends with an affirmation of the "RE­SPONSIBILITY" (DUTY or AUTHORITY) to examine and consider ALL international economic policies and measures in the LIGHT OF THIS OBJECTIVE.

The whole Poverty Program is taken from the Phil­adelphia Declaration of the International Labour Or­ganization. A copy of the booklet, "Lasting Peace the I. L. 0. Way," may be obtained from the International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland; price 25 cents.

Under the paragraph, "Instrument for Peace," we find the popular propaganda line, which have been complete­ly accepted by students and teachers in the school systems and universities and by unsophisticated parsons in the nation's pulpits, that poverty and ignorance breed wars. If, we would just educate the whole world and give them EQUAL OPPORTUNITY and ECONOMIC EQUALITY there would be no more war.

This logic is so shallow that the average bambooz­led student sees the light in the first few seconds when a not-so-literate upstart explains that wars have always been caused by GREED and LUST FOR POWER. Wars have always been caused by the richest men in the warring countries. If the rich and the powerful, in any nation, did not want war, there would be no war simply because these men would shut off the money to the warring leaders. No poor person or group, no illiterate person or group, or both acting in unison, could start or carry on a major war. If elimination of the cause of war is the objective, then poverty and illiteracy are not the proper targets. The I. L. 0. is dead right about one thing: "To have permanent peace, the conditions for it must be established."

Under the Chapter "Attacking the Problem at the Roots" it is stated:

'"The I. L. O.'s efforts to banish poverty from the world extend beyond measures to relieve surface systems. The Organization has realized that it must come to grips with the basic causes of Impoverish­ment and misery if it is to achieve lasting success.

"This realization was expressed in the Declaration of Philadelphia with its assertions that national and international economic and financial policies must be judged in the light of the effect on social prog­ress.

"The Declaration went on to say that the I. L. 0 should do the judging and take economic and finan­cial factors into account in its decisions and recom­mendations. Thus the I. L. 0. was empowered to recommend the economic policies that it believed would result in an improvement in working and liv­ing conditions. It is only common sense that the I. L. O. should have this authority."

At this point Labor, the United Nations and the Council on Foreign Relations would appear to be in a hopeless and conflicting jumble. If it be true that the Council on Foreign Relations RULES the United Na­tions and that the International Labour Organization is the CHIEF agency of the United Nations, does this mean that there is a partnership between the Billionaire Elite of the C. F. R. and LABOR? There IS such a partner­ship and it has existed from the beginning of both or­ganizations.

Briefly, the relationship is this: In the first decade of the 20th Century, the labor movement., seething with discontent engendered by the tyranny of ruthless and predatory capitalists and speculators from the large cities, began to organize into unions and other organiza­tions—socialists, syndicalists, anarchists and even "communists." Many of them openly advocated the over­throw of the government and the extermination of the "Wolves of Wall Street!"

The situation was alarming. With the advent of World War I and American involvement in that war, with troops leaving the country while the revolutionaries remained at home, the Wolves of Wall Street were in a perilous situation. Among the most trusted of the Wall Street whelps was Edward M. House. His services were enlisted and he proceeded to round up the bright­est and most unscrupulous members of the Intercol­legiate Socialist Society, which was making phenom­enal headway in the larger universities. These he or­ganized into The Inquiry. Some of that number (150) were put to work preparing the Covenant of the League of Nations through which their new Wall Street mentors hoped to establish World Government. Others were sent, as infiltrators, into the labor organizations where they soon acquired positions of leadership. Within a few years they had abandoned the old Intercollegiate Socialist Society and had banded together with LABOR in the League for Industrial Democracy, while still working for Wall Street and spying on labor.

In December, 1918, they joined their associates in The Inquiry and trekked to Paris to be on hand when the new World Government would go into business. When the scheme failed, The Inquiry was absorbed into the newly organized Council on Foreign Relations and the labor movement spies became respectable. They abandoned the League for Industrial Democracy and turned in sufficient information to enable the Lusk Committee to raid every radical socialist and labor head­quarters in New York State (June 21, 19T9) and bring in wagonloads of documentary evidence. The Wolves of Wall Street had been then "made safe for democracy."

The dates of the momentous events leading to con­solidation of the labor and world government movements are significant: The I. L. 0. was organized on April 11. 1919 (page 9, Lasting Peace the I. L. 0. Way), the Coun­cil on Foreign Relations on May 30, 1919 and the Lusk Committee raids June 21, 1919. Among the prominent labor leaders of our time, who are, or have been, mem­bers of the Council on Foreign Relations are: Jay Lovestone, George Meany, David MacDonald, David Dubinsky, Irving Brown, Norman Thomas and the late Lee Pressman and Sidney Hillman.

Getting back to "Lasting Peace the I. L. 0. Way," in particular the chapter headed, "The Operational Level," which contains solid study material for surplus industrial workers in the United States. The I. L. 0. HAS authority to move labor, world-wide, at its discre­tion. As the time table of World Empire calls for mov­ing industrial man-power to those sections of the world where there is a shortage of skilled industrial workers, the powers of the International Labour Organization can be brought into play. It has not happened HERE yet BUT IT HAS HAPPENED.

(Page 77) 'Because man-power problems have special regional characteristics a considerable part of the programme is being carried out through field offices. . . During 1950 the migration part of the programme war expanded considerably. This was made possible when a number of the Organiza­tion's European member countries jointly provided a special $1,000,000 fund to finance a series of ac­tivities to stimulate the transfer of workers from labour surplus to labour deficient countries.

"A number of projects under this special migration programme were launched in the latter part of 1950 ...One of these projects was to develop the most satisfactory methods for classifying into broad in­ternational groupings the occupational character­istics of potential emigrants on the one hand and the occupational requirements of immigration countries on the other.

"THE AIM OF THIS PROJECT WAS TO FACILI­TATE THE MATCHING OF IMMIGRANTS WITH THE IMMIGRATION OPPORTUNITIES."

The I. L. 0 has no monopoly on the idea of moving labor. In his State of the Union Message of January 12, 1966, President Johnson said he will recommend leg­islation creating an agency to arrange that:

"Men and women can be easily assigned to jobs where they are most needed, . ."

Revolutionary Governments always get around to this.

A word to the wise INDUSTRIAL WORKER who may soon become SURPLUS: There are tens of thous­ands of millions of dollars of "AID" money invested in dams, roads, railroads, ports, power plants, oil drilling prospects, steel mills, etc., in the Continents of Asia and Africa. It is all ready to be used when sufficient skilled industrial labor and management can be round­ed up, the United Nations operates the whole program and the I. L. O. is at the command of the U. N.  In the Grand Plan for World Empire there is ab­solutely no provision for UNEMPLOYMENT or RE­LIEF. The United Nations, under Article 55 of its Char­ter, guarantees FULL EMPLOYMENT world-wide. Literally volumes have been written about the status of WOMEN in world-wide employment and how the child­ren will be cared for. Not a word is said about what the World-builders plan to do with the aged and the ill. Perhaps there will be none of either in the New World Order.